70th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--1999 Regular Session NOTE: Matter within { + braces and plus signs + } in an amended section is new. Matter within { - braces and minus signs - } is existing law to be omitted. New sections are within { + braces and plus signs + } . LC 3649 House Bill 2010 Sponsored by Representative WILSON; Representatives ATKINSON, BACKLUND, BEYER, BUTLER, CLOSE, KNOPP, KRUMMEL, KRUSE, SIMMONS, SUNSERI, WITT, Senator STARR SUMMARY The following summary is not prepared by the sponsors of the measure and is not a part of the body thereof subject to consideration by the Legislative Assembly. It is an editor's brief statement of the essential features of the measure as introduced. Allows pharmacist, pharmacy owner or pharmacy operator to refuse to fill particular type of prescription on ethical or religious grounds. A BILL FOR AN ACT Relating to refusal to fill prescriptions in practice of pharmacy. Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon: SECTION 1. { + Section 2 of this 1999 Act is added to and made a part of ORS chapter 689. + } SECTION 2. { + (1) A pharmacist who objects to filling a particular type of prescription on the grounds that to do so would violate the pharmacist's ethical or religious principles and who has stated this conscientious objection in writing to the pharmacist's supervisor, shall not be required to fill such a prescription and may not be disciplined by any administrative authority for refusing to fill the prescription. (2) If an owner or operator of a pharmacy objects to filling a particular type of prescription on the grounds that to do so would violate the owner's or operator's ethical or religious principles, the owner or operator is not required to fill the prescription and the refusal to do so may not be the basis for disciplinary action by any administrative authority. (3) If a pharmacist refuses to fill, or states the intention to refuse to fill, a particular type of prescription on the grounds that to do so would violate the pharmacist's ethical or religious principles and has stated this conscientious objection in writing, the employer of the pharmacist may not discharge, discipline, discriminate or retaliate against or deny employment or promotion to the pharmacist. (4) A pharmacist who refuses to fill a particular type of prescription under subsection (1) of this section and the owner and the operator of the pharmacy at which the pharmacist practices are immune from liability for any harm resulting from the refusal. (5) A pharmacist, pharmacy owner or pharmacy operator may not be denied public funds for which they would otherwise be eligible on the basis of a pharmacist refusing to fill a particular type of prescription under this section. + } ----------