Chapter 151
Oregon Laws 2011
AN ACT
HB 2714
Relating to
crime; creating new provisions; and amending ORS 12.117, 90.396, 105.555,
131.602, 133.724, 133.726, 167.007, 342.143 and 419B.005.
Be It Enacted by the People of the State of Oregon:
SECTION 1. ORS 167.007 is amended to
read:
167.007. (1) A person commits the
crime of prostitution if[:]
[(a)]
the person engages in, or offers or agrees to engage in, sexual
conduct or sexual contact in return for a fee.[; or]
[(b)
The person pays or offers or agrees to pay a fee to engage in sexual conduct or
sexual contact.]
(2) Prostitution is a Class A
misdemeanor.
SECTION 2. Section 3 of this 2011
Act is added to and made a part of ORS 167.007 to 167.017.
SECTION 3. (1) A person commits
the crime of patronizing a prostitute if the person pays, or offers or agrees
to pay, a fee to engage in sexual conduct or sexual contact.
(2) Patronizing a prostitute is a
Class A misdemeanor.
(3)(a) When a person convicted of
violating this section is 18 years of age or older at the time the offense is
committed and the person paid, or offered or agreed to pay, a fee to a minor to
engage in sexual conduct or sexual contact, in addition to any other sentence
that may be imposed, the court shall impose and may not suspend the sentence
described in paragraph (b) of this subsection.
(b) Notwithstanding ORS 161.635, the
mandatory minimum sentences that apply to paragraph (a) of this subsection are
as follows:
(A) For a person’s first conviction, a
fine in the amount of $10,000.
(B) For a person’s second conviction,
a fine in the amount of $20,000 and a term of incarceration of at least seven
days.
(C) For a person’s third or subsequent
conviction, a fine in the amount of $20,000 and a term of incarceration of at
least 30 days.
(c) Notwithstanding paragraphs (a) and
(b) of this subsection, if the court determines that the person is unable to
pay the full amount of the mandatory minimum fine, the court shall impose and
may not suspend a fine in an amount the court determines the person is able to
pay.
(d) In a prosecution in which it is
alleged that this subsection applies, the state need not prove that the person
knew the minor was under 18 years of age and it is no defense that the person
did not know the minor’s age or that the person reasonably believed the minor
to be 18 years of age or older.
(e) As used in this subsection, “minor”
means a person under 18 years of age.
SECTION 4. ORS 12.117 is amended to
read:
12.117. (1) Notwithstanding ORS
12.110, 12.115 or 12.160, an action based on conduct that constitutes child
abuse or conduct knowingly allowing, permitting or encouraging child abuse that
occurs while the person is under 18 years of age must be commenced before the
person attains 40 years of age, or if the person has not discovered the causal
connection between the injury and the child abuse, nor in the exercise of
reasonable care should have discovered the causal connection between the injury
and the child abuse, not more than five years from the date the person
discovers or in the exercise of reasonable care should have discovered the
causal connection between the child abuse and the injury, whichever period is
longer.
(2) As used in subsection (1) of this
section, “child abuse” means any of the following:
(a) Intentional conduct by an adult
that results in:
(A) Any physical injury to a child; or
(B) Any mental injury to a child which
results in observable and substantial impairment of the child’s mental or
psychological ability to function caused by cruelty to the child, with due
regard to the culture of the child;
(b) Rape of a child, which includes
but is not limited to rape, sodomy, unlawful sexual penetration and incest, as
those acts are defined in ORS chapter 163;
(c) Sexual abuse, as defined in ORS
chapter 163, when the victim is a child; or
(d) Sexual exploitation of a child,
including but not limited to:
(A) Conduct constituting violation of
ORS 163.435 and any other conduct which allows, employs, authorizes, permits,
induces or encourages a child to engage in the performing for people to observe
or the photographing, filming, tape recording or other exhibition which, in
whole or in part, depicts sexual conduct or contact; and
(B) Allowing, permitting, encouraging
or hiring a child to engage in prostitution or to patronize a prostitute,
as defined in ORS chapter 167.
(3) Nothing in this section creates a
new cause of action or enlarges any existing cause of action.
SECTION 5. ORS 90.396 is amended to
read:
90.396. (1) Except as provided in subsection
(2) of this section, after at least 24 hours’ written notice specifying the
acts and omissions constituting the cause and specifying the date and time of
the termination, the landlord may terminate the rental agreement and take
possession as provided in ORS 105.105 to 105.168, if:
(a) The tenant, someone in the tenant’s
control or the tenant’s pet seriously threatens to inflict substantial personal
injury, or inflicts any substantial personal injury, upon a person on the
premises other than the tenant;
(b) The tenant or someone in the
tenant’s control recklessly endangers a person on the premises other than the
tenant by creating a serious risk of substantial personal injury;
(c) The tenant, someone in the tenant’s
control or the tenant’s pet inflicts any substantial personal injury upon a
neighbor living in the immediate vicinity of the premises;
(d) The tenant or someone in the
tenant’s control intentionally inflicts any substantial damage to the premises
or the tenant’s pet inflicts substantial damage to the premises on more than
one occasion;
(e)(A) The tenant intentionally
provided substantial false information on the application for the tenancy
within the past year;
(B) The false information was with
regard to a criminal conviction of the tenant that would have been material to
the landlord’s acceptance of the application; and
(C) The landlord terminates the rental
agreement within 30 days after discovering the falsity of the information; or
(f) The tenant, someone in the tenant’s
control or the tenant’s pet commits any act that is outrageous in the extreme,
on the premises or in the immediate vicinity of the premises. For purposes of
this paragraph, an act is outrageous in the extreme if the act is not described
in paragraphs (a) to (e) of this subsection, but is similar in degree and is
one that a reasonable person in that community would consider to be so
offensive as to warrant termination of the tenancy within 24 hours, considering
the seriousness of the act or the risk to others. An act that is outrageous in
the extreme is more extreme or serious than an act that warrants a 30-day
termination under ORS 90.392. Acts that are “outrageous in the extreme”
include, but are not limited to, the following acts by a person:
(A) Prostitution, patronizing a
prostitute or [promotion of] promoting
prostitution, as described in ORS 167.007 and 167.012and section 3 of this
2011 Act;
(B) Manufacture, delivery or
possession of a controlled substance, as described in ORS 475.005, but not
including:
(i) The medical use of marijuana in
compliance with ORS 475.300 to 475.346;
(ii) Possession of, or delivery for no
consideration of, less than one avoirdupois ounce of marijuana as described in
ORS 475.860 (3) or 475.864 (3); or
(iii) Possession of prescription
drugs;
(C) Intimidation, as described in ORS
166.155 and 166.165; or
(D) Burglary as described in ORS
164.215 and 164.225.
(2) If the cause for a termination
notice given pursuant to subsection (1) of this section is based upon the acts
of the tenant’s pet, the tenant may cure the cause and avoid termination of the
tenancy by removing the pet from the premises prior to the end of the notice
period. The notice must describe the right of the tenant to cure the cause. If
the tenant returns the pet to the premises at any time after having cured the
violation, the landlord, after at least 24 hours’ written notice specifying the
subsequent presence of the offending pet, may terminate the rental agreement
and take possession as provided in ORS 105.105 to 105.168. The tenant does not
have a right to cure this subsequent violation.
(3) For purposes of subsection (1) of
this section, someone is in the tenant’s control if that person enters or
remains on the premises with the tenant’s permission or consent after the
tenant reasonably knows or should know of that person’s act or likelihood to
commit any act of the type described in subsection (1) of this section.
(4) An act can be proven to be
outrageous in the extreme even if the act is one that does not violate a
criminal statute. Notwithstanding the references to criminal statutes in
subsection (1)(f) of this section, the landlord’s burden of proof in an action
for possession under subsection (1) of this section is the civil standard of
proof by a preponderance of the evidence.
(5) If a good faith effort by a
landlord to terminate the tenancy under subsection (1)(f) of this section and
to recover possession of the rental unit under ORS 105.105 to 105.168 fails by
decision of the court, the landlord may not be found in violation of any state
statute or local ordinance requiring the landlord to remove that tenant upon
threat of fine, abatement or forfeiture as long as the landlord continues to
make a good faith effort to terminate the tenancy.
SECTION 6. ORS 105.555 is amended to
read:
105.555. (1) The following are
declared to be nuisances and shall be enjoined and abated as provided in ORS
105.550 to 105.600:
(a) Any place that, as a regular
course of business, is used for the purpose of prostitution and any place where
acts of prostitution or patronizing a prostitute occur;
(b) Any place that is used and
maintained for profit and for the purpose of gambling or a lottery, as defined
in ORS 167.117, by any person, partnership or corporation organized for profit
and wherein take place any of the acts or wherein are kept, stored or located
any of the games, devices or things that are forbidden by or made punishable by
ORS 167.108 to 167.164;
(c) Any place that has been determined
to be not fit for use under ORS 453.876 and that has not been decontaminated
and certified as fit for use under ORS 453.885 within 180 days after the
determination under ORS 453.876; and
(d) Any place where activity involving
the unauthorized delivery, manufacture or possession of a controlled substance,
as defined in ORS 475.005, occurs or any place wherein are kept, stored or
located any of the devices, equipment, things or substances used for
unauthorized delivery, manufacture or possession of a controlled substance. As
used in this paragraph, “devices, equipment, things” does not include
hypodermic syringes or needles. This paragraph does not apply to acts that
constitute violations under ORS 475.860 or 475.864.
(2) Nothing in ORS 105.550 to 105.600,
166.715 and 167.158 applies to property to the extent that the devices,
equipment, things or substances that are used for delivery, manufacture or
possession of a controlled substance are kept, stored or located in or on the
property for the purpose of lawful sale or use of these items.
SECTION 7. ORS 131.602 is amended to
read:
131.602. The crimes to which ORS
131.550 (12)(b) applies are:
(1) Bribe giving, as defined in ORS
162.015.
(2) Bribe receiving, as defined in ORS
162.025.
(3) Public investment fraud, as
defined in ORS 162.117.
(4) Bribing a witness, as defined in
ORS 162.265.
(5) Bribe receiving by a witness, as
defined in ORS 162.275.
(6) Simulating legal process, as
defined in ORS 162.355.
(7) Official misconduct in the first
degree, as defined in ORS 162.415.
(8) Custodial interference in the
second degree, as defined in ORS 163.245.
(9) Custodial interference in the
first degree, as defined in ORS 163.257.
(10) Buying or selling a person under
18 years of age, as defined in ORS 163.537.
(11) Using a child in a display of
sexually explicit conduct, as defined in ORS 163.670.
(12) Encouraging child sexual abuse in
the first degree, as defined in ORS 163.684.
(13) Encouraging child sexual abuse in
the second degree, as defined in ORS 163.686.
(14) Encouraging child sexual abuse in
the third degree, as defined in ORS 163.687.
(15) Possession of materials depicting
sexually explicit conduct of a child in the first degree, as defined in ORS
163.688.
(16) Possession of materials depicting
sexually explicit conduct of a child in the second degree, as defined in ORS
163.689.
(17) Theft in the second degree, as
defined in ORS 164.045.
(18) Theft in the first degree, as
defined in ORS 164.055.
(19) Aggravated theft in the first
degree, as defined in ORS 164.057.
(20) Theft by extortion, as defined in
ORS 164.075.
(21) Theft by deception, as defined in
ORS 164.085, if it is a felony or a Class A misdemeanor.
(22) Theft by receiving, as defined in
ORS 164.095, if it is a felony or a Class A misdemeanor.
(23) Theft of services, as defined in
ORS 164.125, if it is a felony or a Class A misdemeanor.
(24) Unauthorized use of a vehicle, as
defined in ORS 164.135.
(25) Mail theft or receipt of stolen
mail, as defined in ORS 164.162.
(26) Laundering a monetary instrument,
as defined in ORS 164.170.
(27) Engaging in a financial
transaction in property derived from unlawful activity, as defined in ORS
164.172.
(28) Burglary in the second degree, as
defined in ORS 164.215.
(29) Burglary in the first degree, as
defined in ORS 164.225.
(30) Possession of a burglary tool or
theft device, as defined in ORS 164.235.
(31) Unlawful entry into a motor
vehicle, as defined in ORS 164.272.
(32) Arson in the second degree, as
defined in ORS 164.315.
(33) Arson in the first degree, as
defined in ORS 164.325.
(34) Computer crime, as defined in ORS
164.377.
(35) Robbery in the third degree, as
defined in ORS 164.395.
(36) Robbery in the second degree, as
defined in ORS 164.405.
(37) Robbery in the first degree, as
defined in ORS 164.415.
(38) Unlawful labeling of a sound
recording, as defined in ORS 164.868.
(39) Unlawful recording of a live
performance, as defined in ORS 164.869.
(40) Unlawful labeling of a videotape
recording, as defined in ORS 164.872.
(41) A violation of ORS 164.886.
(42)(a) Endangering aircraft in the
first degree, as defined in ORS 164.885.
(b) Endangering aircraft in the second
degree, as defined in ORS 164.885.
(43) Interference with agricultural
operations, as defined in ORS 164.887.
(44) Forgery in the second degree, as
defined in ORS 165.007.
(45) Forgery in the first degree, as
defined in ORS 165.013.
(46) Criminal possession of a forged
instrument in the second degree, as defined in ORS 165.017.
(47) Criminal possession of a forged
instrument in the first degree, as defined in ORS 165.022.
(48) Criminal possession of a forgery
device, as defined in ORS 165.032.
(49) Criminal simulation, as defined
in ORS 165.037.
(50) Fraudulently obtaining a
signature, as defined in ORS 165.042.
(51) Fraudulent use of a credit card,
as defined in ORS 165.055.
(52) Negotiating a bad check, as
defined in ORS 165.065.
(53) Possessing a fraudulent
communications device, as defined in ORS 165.070.
(54) Unlawful factoring of a payment
card transaction, as defined in ORS 165.074.
(55) Falsifying business records, as
defined in ORS 165.080.
(56) Sports bribery, as defined in ORS
165.085.
(57) Sports bribe receiving, as
defined in ORS 165.090.
(58) Misapplication of entrusted
property, as defined in ORS 165.095.
(59) Issuing a false financial
statement, as defined in ORS 165.100.
(60) Obtaining execution of documents
by deception, as defined in ORS 165.102.
(61) A violation of ORS 165.543.
(62) Cellular counterfeiting in the
third degree, as defined in ORS 165.577.
(63) Cellular counterfeiting in the
second degree, as defined in ORS 165.579.
(64) Cellular counterfeiting in the
first degree, as defined in ORS 165.581.
(65) Identity theft, as defined in ORS
165.800.
(66) A violation of ORS 166.190.
(67) Unlawful use of a weapon, as
defined in ORS 166.220.
(68) A violation of ORS 166.240.
(69) Unlawful possession of a firearm,
as defined in ORS 166.250.
(70) A violation of ORS 166.270.
(71) Unlawful possession of a machine
gun, short-barreled rifle, short-barreled shotgun or firearms silencer, as
defined in ORS 166.272.
(72) A violation of ORS 166.275.
(73) Unlawful possession of armor
piercing ammunition, as defined in ORS 166.350.
(74) A violation of ORS 166.370.
(75) Unlawful possession of a destructive
device, as defined in ORS 166.382.
(76) Unlawful manufacture of a
destructive device, as defined in ORS 166.384.
(77) Possession of a hoax destructive
device, as defined in ORS 166.385.
(78) A violation of ORS 166.410.
(79) Providing false information in
connection with a transfer of a firearm, as defined in ORS 166.416.
(80) Improperly transferring a
firearm, as defined in ORS 166.418.
(81) Unlawfully purchasing a firearm,
as defined in ORS 166.425.
(82) A violation of ORS 166.429.
(83) A violation of ORS 166.470.
(84) A violation of ORS 166.480.
(85) A violation of ORS 166.635.
(86) A violation of ORS 166.638.
(87) Unlawful paramilitary activity,
as defined in ORS 166.660.
(88) A violation of ORS 166.720.
(89) Prostitution, as defined in ORS
167.007.
(90) Patronizing a prostitute, as
defined in section 3 of this 2011 Act.
[(90)]
(91) Promoting prostitution, as defined in ORS 167.012.
[(91)]
(92) Compelling prostitution, as defined in ORS 167.017.
[(92)]
(93) Exhibiting an obscene performance to a minor, as defined in ORS
167.075.
[(93)]
(94) Unlawful gambling in the second degree, as defined in ORS 167.122.
[(94)]
(95) Unlawful gambling in the first degree, as defined in ORS 167.127.
[(95)]
(96) Possession of gambling records in the second degree, as defined in ORS
167.132.
[(96)]
(97) Possession of gambling records in the first degree, as defined in ORS
167.137.
[(97)]
(98) Possession of a gambling device, as defined in ORS 167.147.
[(98)]
(99) Possession of a gray machine, as defined in ORS 167.164.
[(99)]
(100) Cheating, as defined in ORS 167.167.
[(100)]
(101) Tampering with drug records, as defined in ORS 167.212.
[(101)]
(102) A violation of ORS 167.262.
[(102)]
(103) Research and animal interference, as defined in ORS 167.312.
[(103)]
(104) Animal abuse in the first degree, as defined in ORS 167.320.
[(104)]
(105) Aggravated animal abuse in the first degree, as defined in ORS
167.322.
[(105)]
(106) Animal neglect in the first degree, as defined in ORS 167.330.
[(106)]
(107) Interfering with an assistance, a search and rescue or a therapy
animal, as defined in ORS 167.352.
[(107)]
(108) Involvement in animal fighting, as defined in ORS 167.355.
[(108)]
(109) Dogfighting, as defined in ORS 167.365.
[(109)]
(110) Participation in dogfighting, as defined in ORS 167.370.
[(110)]
(111) Unauthorized use of a livestock animal, as defined in ORS 167.385.
[(111)]
(112) Interference with livestock production, as defined in ORS 167.388.
[(112)]
(113) A violation of ORS 167.390.
[(113)]
(114) Participation in cockfighting, as defined in ORS 167.431.
[(114)]
(115) A violation of ORS 471.410.
[(115)]
(116) Failure to report missing precursor substances, as defined in ORS
475.955.
[(116)]
(117) Illegally selling drug equipment, as defined in ORS 475.960.
[(117)]
(118) Providing false information on a precursor substances report, as
defined in ORS 475.965.
[(118)]
(119) Unlawful delivery of an imitation controlled substance, as defined in
ORS 475.912.
[(119)]
(120) A violation of ORS 475.840, if it is a felony or a Class A
misdemeanor.
[(120)]
(121) A violation of ORS 475.914, if it is a felony or a Class A
misdemeanor.
[(121)]
(122) A violation of ORS 475.916.
[(122)]
(123) A violation of ORS 475.906, if it is a felony or a Class A
misdemeanor.
[(123)]
(124) A violation of ORS 475.904.
[(124)]
(125) Misuse of an identification card, as defined in ORS 807.430.
[(125)]
(126) Unlawful production of identification cards, licenses, permits, forms
or camera cards, as defined in ORS 807.500.
[(126)]
(127) Transfer of documents for the purposes of misrepresentation, as
defined in ORS 807.510.
[(127)]
(128) Using an invalid license, as defined in ORS 807.580.
[(128)]
(129) Permitting misuse of a license, as defined in ORS 807.590.
[(129)]
(130) Using another’s license, as defined in ORS 807.600.
[(130)]
(131) Criminal driving while suspended or revoked, as defined in ORS
811.182, when it is a felony.
[(131)]
(132) Driving while under the influence of intoxicants, as defined in ORS
813.010, when it is a felony.
[(132)]
(133) Unlawful distribution of cigarettes, as defined in ORS 323.482.
[(133)]
(134) Unlawful distribution of tobacco products, as defined in ORS 323.632.
[(134)]
(135) A violation of ORS 180.440 (2) or 180.486 (2).
[(135)]
(136) A violation described in ORS 475.846 to 475.894, if it is a felony.
[(136)]
(137) Subjecting another person to involuntary servitude in the first
degree, as defined in ORS 163.264.
[(137)]
(138) Subjecting another person to involuntary servitude in the second
degree, as defined in ORS 163.263.
[(138)]
(139) Trafficking in persons, as defined in ORS 163.266.
[(139)]
(140) Furnishing sexually explicit material to a child, as defined in ORS
167.054.
[(140)]
(141) Luring a minor, as defined in ORS 167.057.
[(141)]
(142) Online sexual corruption of a child in the second degree, as defined
in ORS 163.432.
[(142)]
(143) Online sexual corruption of a child in the first degree, as defined
in ORS 163.433.
[(143)]
(144) An attempt, conspiracy or solicitation to commit a crime in
subsections (1) to [(142)] (143)
of this section if the attempt, conspiracy or solicitation is a felony or a
Class A misdemeanor.
SECTION 8. ORS 133.724 is amended to
read:
133.724. (1) An ex parte order for the
interception of wire, electronic or oral communications may be issued by any
circuit court judge upon written application made upon oath or affirmation of
the individual who is the district attorney or a deputy district attorney
authorized by the district attorney for the county in which the order is
sought. The application shall include:
(a) The name of the district attorney
or the deputy district attorney making the application and the authority of the
district attorney or the deputy district attorney to make the application;
(b) The identity of the investigative
or law enforcement officer making the application and the officer authorizing
the application;
(c) A statement demonstrating that
there is probable cause to believe that an individual is committing, has
committed or is about to commit:
(A) A particular felony of murder,
kidnapping, arson, robbery, bribery, extortion or other crime dangerous to life
and punishable as a felony;
(B) A crime punishable as a felony
under ORS 166.720, 475.840, 475.846 to 475.894 or 475.904 to 475.910 or as a
misdemeanor under ORS 167.007 or section 3 of this 2011 Act; or
(C) Any conspiracy to commit any of
the foregoing crimes;
(d) A statement of the details, if
known, of the particular crime alleged under paragraph (c) of this subsection;
(e) A particular description of the
nature and location of the facilities from which or the place where the wire,
electronic or oral communication is to be intercepted, if known;
(f) A particular description of the
type of wire, electronic or oral communication sought to be intercepted;
(g) The identity of the person, if
known, suspected of committing the crime and whose wire, electronic or oral
communications are to be intercepted;
(h) A full and complete statement as
to whether or not other investigative procedures have been tried and failed or
why other investigative procedures reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed
if tried or are likely to be too dangerous;
(i) A statement of the period of time
for which the interception is required to be maintained. If the nature of the
investigation is such that the authorization for interception should not
automatically terminate when the described type of wire, electronic or oral
communication has been first obtained, a description of facts establishing
probable cause to believe that additional communications of the same type will
occur thereafter;
(j) A statement as to whether any
prior application has been made to intercept wire, electronic or oral
communications from the same person and, if such prior application exists, a
statement of the current status of that application; and
(k) Where the application is for the
extension of an existing order, a statement setting forth the results thus far
obtained from the interception, or a reasonable explanation of the failure to
obtain such results.
(2) The judge may require the
applicant to furnish further testimony or documentary evidence in support of
the application.
(3) Upon examination of such
application and evidence the judge may enter an ex parte order, as requested or
as modified, authorizing or approving interception of wire, electronic or oral
communications within the state if the judge determines on the basis of the
facts submitted by the applicant that:
(a) There is probable cause for belief
that an individual is committing, has committed or is about to commit a
particular crime described in subsection (1)(c) of this section;
(b) There is probable cause for belief
that particular communications concerning that crime will be obtained through
such interception;
(c) Normal investigative procedures
have been tried and have failed or reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed
if tried or are likely to be too dangerous; and
(d) There is probable cause for belief
that the facilities from which, or the place where, the wire, electronic or
oral communications to be intercepted are being used, or are about to be used,
in connection with the planning or the commission of that crime are open to the
public or are owned by, leased to, listed in the name of, or commonly used by
the individual suspected.
(4) Each order authorizing or
approving the interception of any wire, electronic or oral communication shall
specify:
(a) The identity of the person, if
known, whose communications are to be intercepted;
(b) The nature and location of the
communications facilities as to which, or the place where, authority to
intercept is granted;
(c) A particular description of the
type of communication sought to be intercepted, and a statement of the particular
crime to which it relates;
(d) The identity of the agency
authorized to intercept the communications and of the person authorizing the
application;
(e) The period of time during which
such interception is authorized, including a statement as to whether or not the
interception shall automatically terminate when the described communication has
been first obtained; and
(f) The name of the applicant, date of
issuance, and the signature and title of the issuing judge.
(5) An order entered pursuant to this
section may not authorize or approve the interception of any wire, electronic
or oral communication for any period longer than is necessary to achieve the
objective of authorization and in no event for longer than 30 days. Extensions
of any order may be granted, but only when application for an extension is made
in accordance with subsection (1)(k) of this section and the court makes the
findings required by subsection (3) of this section. The period of extension
shall be no longer than the authorizing judge deems necessary to achieve the
purpose for which it is granted and in no event for longer than 30 days. Every
order and extension of that order shall contain a provision that the
authorization to intercept must be executed as soon as practicable, must be
conducted in such a way as to minimize the interception of communications not
otherwise subject to interception, and must terminate upon attainment of the
authorized objective, or in any event in 30 days.
(6) Whenever an order authorizing
interception is entered pursuant to this section, the order may require reports
to be made to the judge who issued the order showing what progress has been
made toward achievement of the authorized objective and the need for continued
interception. Such reports shall be made at such intervals as the judge may
require.
SECTION 9. ORS 133.726 is amended to
read:
133.726. (1) Notwithstanding ORS
133.724, under the circumstances described in this section, a law enforcement
officer is authorized to intercept an oral communication to which the officer
or a person under the direct supervision of the officer is a party, without
obtaining an order for the interception of a wire, electronic or oral
communication under ORS 133.724.
(2) For purposes of this section and
ORS 133.736, a person is a party to an oral communication if the oral
communication is made in the person’s immediate presence and is audible to the
person regardless of whether the communication is specifically directed to the
person.
(3) An ex parte order for intercepting
an oral communication in any county of this state under this section may be
issued by any judge as defined in ORS 133.525 upon written application made
upon oath or affirmation of the district attorney or a deputy district attorney
authorized by the district attorney for the county in which the order is sought
or upon the oath or affirmation of any peace officer as defined in ORS 133.005.
The application shall include:
(a) The name of the applicant and the
applicant’s authority to make the application;
(b) A statement demonstrating that:
(A) There is probable cause to believe
that a person whose oral communication is to be intercepted is engaged in
committing, has committed or is about to commit a particular felony, or a
misdemeanor under ORS 167.007 or section 3 of this 2011 Act, and that
intercepting the oral communication will yield evidence thereof; or
(B)(i) There is reasonable suspicion
to believe that a person whose oral communication is to be intercepted is
engaged in committing, has committed or is about to commit a crime;
(ii) There is reasonable suspicion to
believe that the circumstances in which the oral communication is to be
intercepted present a substantial risk of death, serious physical injury or
sexual assault to a law enforcement officer or a person under the direct
supervision of the officer;
(iii) Interception of the oral
communication is necessary to protect the safety of the person who may be
endangered; and
(iv) Other investigative procedures
have been tried and have failed or reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed
if tried or are likely to be too dangerous; and
(c) The identity of the person, if
known, suspected of committing the crime and whose oral communication is to be
intercepted.
(4) The judge may require the
applicant to furnish further testimony or documentary evidence in support of
the application.
(5) Upon examination of the
application and evidence, the judge may enter an ex parte order, as requested
or as modified, authorizing or approving the interception of an oral
communication within the state if the judge determines on the basis of the
facts submitted by the applicant that:
(a)(A) There is probable cause to
believe that a person is engaged in committing, has committed or is about to
commit a particular felony, or a misdemeanor under ORS 167.007 or section 3
of this 2011 Act; and
(B) There is probable cause to believe
that the oral communication to be obtained will contain evidence concerning
that crime; or
(b)(A) There is reasonable suspicion
to believe that a person whose oral communication is to be intercepted is
engaged in committing, has committed or is about to commit a crime;
(B) There is reasonable suspicion to
believe that the circumstances in which the oral communication is to be
intercepted present a substantial risk of death, serious physical injury or
sexual assault to a law enforcement officer or a person under the direct
supervision of the officer;
(C) Interception of the oral
communication is necessary to protect the safety of the person who may be
endangered; and
(D) Other investigative procedures
have been tried and have failed or reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed
if tried or are likely to be too dangerous.
(6) An order authorizing or approving
the interception of an oral communication under this section must specify:
(a) The identity of the person, if
known, whose oral communication is to be intercepted;
(b) A statement identifying the
particular crime to which the oral communication is expected to relate;
(c) The agency authorized under the
order to intercept the oral communication;
(d) The name and office of the
applicant and the signature and title of the issuing judge;
(e) A period of time after which the
order shall expire; and
(f) A statement that the order
authorizes only the interception of an oral communication to which a law
enforcement officer or a person under the direct supervision of a law
enforcement officer is a party.
(7) An order under ORS 133.724 or this
section is not required when a law enforcement officer intercepts an oral
communication to which the officer or a person under the direct supervision of
the officer is a party if the oral communication is made by a person whom the
officer has probable cause to believe has committed, is engaged in committing
or is about to commit:
(a) A crime punishable as a felony
under ORS 475.840, 475.846 to 475.894 or 475.904 to 475.910 or as a misdemeanor
under ORS 167.007 or section 3 of this 2011 Act; or
(b) Any other crime punishable as a
felony if the circumstances at the time the oral communication is intercepted
are of such exigency that it would be unreasonable to obtain a court order
under ORS 133.724 or this section.
(8) A law enforcement officer who
intercepts an oral communication pursuant to this section may not intentionally
fail to record and preserve the oral communication in its entirety. A law
enforcement officer, or a person under the direct supervision of the officer,
who is authorized under this section to intercept an oral communication is not
required to exclude from the interception an oral communication made by a
person for whom probable cause does not exist if the officer or the person
under the officer’s direct supervision is a party to the oral communication.
(9) A law enforcement officer may not
divulge the contents of an oral communication intercepted under this section
before a preliminary hearing or trial in which an oral communication is going
to be introduced as evidence against a person except:
(a) To a superior officer or other
official with whom the law enforcement officer is cooperating in the
enforcement of the criminal laws of this state or the United States;
(b) To a magistrate;
(c) In a presentation to a federal or
state grand jury; or
(d) In compliance with a court order.
(10) A law enforcement officer may
intercept an oral communication under this section only when acting within the
scope of the officer’s employment and as a part of assigned duties.
(11) As used in this section, “law
enforcement officer” means an officer employed by the United States, this state
or a municipal government within this state, or a political subdivision,
agency, department or bureau of those governments, to enforce criminal laws.
(12) Violation of subsection (9) of
this section is a Class A misdemeanor.
SECTION 10. ORS 133.726, as amended
by section 3, chapter 442, Oregon Laws 2007, is amended to read:
133.726. (1) Notwithstanding ORS
133.724, under the circumstances described in this section, a law enforcement
officer is authorized to intercept an oral communication to which the officer
or a person under the direct supervision of the officer is a party, without
obtaining an order for the interception of a wire, electronic or oral
communication under ORS 133.724.
(2) For purposes of this section and
ORS 133.736, a person is a party to an oral communication if the oral
communication is made in the person’s immediate presence and is audible to the
person regardless of whether the communication is specifically directed to the
person.
(3) An ex parte order for intercepting
an oral communication in any county of this state under this section may be
issued by any judge as defined in ORS 133.525 upon written application made
upon oath or affirmation of the district attorney or a deputy district attorney
authorized by the district attorney for the county in which the order is sought
or upon the oath or affirmation of any peace officer as defined in ORS 133.005.
The application shall include:
(a) The name of the applicant and the
applicant’s authority to make the application;
(b) A statement demonstrating that
there is probable cause to believe that a person whose oral communication is to
be intercepted is engaged in committing, has committed or is about to commit a
particular felony, or a misdemeanor under ORS 167.007 or section 3 of this
2011 Act, and that intercepting the oral communication will yield evidence
thereof; and
(c) The identity of the person, if
known, suspected of committing the crime and whose oral communication is to be
intercepted.
(4) The judge may require the
applicant to furnish further testimony or documentary evidence in support of
the application.
(5) Upon examination of the
application and evidence, the judge may enter an ex parte order, as requested
or as modified, authorizing or approving the interception of an oral
communication within the state if the judge determines on the basis of the
facts submitted by the applicant that:
(a) There is probable cause to believe
that a person is engaged in committing, has committed or is about to commit a
particular felony, or a misdemeanor under ORS 167.007 or section 3 of this
2011 Act; and
(b) There is probable cause to believe
that the oral communication to be obtained will contain evidence concerning
that crime.
(6) An order authorizing or approving
the interception of an oral communication under this section must specify:
(a) The identity of the person, if
known, whose oral communication is to be intercepted;
(b) A statement identifying the
particular crime to which the oral communication is expected to relate;
(c) The agency authorized under the
order to intercept the oral communication;
(d) The name and office of the
applicant and the signature and title of the issuing judge;
(e) A period of time after which the
order shall expire; and
(f) A statement that the order
authorizes only the interception of an oral communication to which a law
enforcement officer or a person under the direct supervision of a law
enforcement officer is a party.
(7) An order under ORS 133.724 or this
section is not required when a law enforcement officer intercepts an oral
communication to which the officer or a person under the direct supervision of
the officer is a party if the oral communication is made by a person whom the officer
has probable cause to believe has committed, is engaged in committing or is
about to commit:
(a) A crime punishable as a felony
under ORS 475.840, 475.846 to 475.894 or 475.906 or as a misdemeanor under ORS
167.007 or section 3 of this 2011 Act; or
(b) Any other crime punishable as a
felony if the circumstances at the time the oral communication is intercepted
are of such exigency that it would be unreasonable to obtain a court order
under ORS 133.724 or this section.
(8) A law enforcement officer who
intercepts an oral communication pursuant to this section may not intentionally
fail to record and preserve the oral communication in its entirety. A law
enforcement officer, or a person under the direct supervision of the officer,
who is authorized under this section to intercept an oral communication is not
required to exclude from the interception an oral communication made by a
person for whom probable cause does not exist if the officer or the person
under the officer’s direct supervision is a party to the oral communication.
(9) A law enforcement officer may not
divulge the contents of an oral communication intercepted under this section
before a preliminary hearing or trial in which an oral communication is going
to be introduced as evidence against a person except:
(a) To a superior officer or other
official with whom the law enforcement officer is cooperating in the
enforcement of the criminal laws of this state or the United States;
(b) To a magistrate;
(c) In a presentation to a federal or
state grand jury; or
(d) In compliance with a court order.
(10) A law enforcement officer may
intercept an oral communication under this section only when acting within the
scope of the officer’s employment and as a part of assigned duties.
(11) As used in this section, “law
enforcement officer” means an officer employed by the United States, this state
or a municipal government within this state, or a political subdivision,
agency, department or bureau of those governments, to enforce criminal laws.
(12) Violation of subsection (9) of
this section is a Class A misdemeanor.
SECTION 11. ORS 342.143 is amended to
read:
342.143. (1) No teaching, personnel
service or administrative license shall be issued to any person until the
person has attained the age of 18 years and has furnished satisfactory evidence
of proper educational training.
(2) The Teacher Standards and
Practices Commission may require an applicant for a teaching, personnel service
or administrative license or for registration as a public charter school
teacher or administrator to furnish evidence satisfactory to the commission of
good moral character, mental and physical health, and such other evidence as it
may deem necessary to establish the applicant’s fitness to serve as a teacher
or administrator.
(3) Without limiting the powers of the
Teacher Standards and Practices Commission under subsection (2) of this
section:
(a) No teaching, personnel service or
administrative license or registration as a public charter school teacher or
administrator shall be issued to any person who:
(A) Has been convicted of a crime
listed in ORS 163.095, 163.115, 163.185, 163.235, 163.355, 163.365, 163.375,
163.385, 163.395, 163.405, 163.408, 163.411, 163.415, 163.425, 163.427,
163.432, 163.433, 163.435, 163.445, 163.465, 163.515, 163.525, 163.547,
163.575, 163.670, 163.675 (1985 Replacement Part), 163.680 (1993 Edition),
163.684, 163.686, 163.687, 163.688, 163.689, 164.325, 164.415, 166.005,
166.087, 167.007, 167.012, 167.017, 167.054, 167.057, 167.062, 167.075,
167.080, 167.090, 475.848, 475.852, 475.858, 475.860, 475.862, 475.864 (4),
475.868, 475.872, 475.878, 475.880, 475.882, 475.888, 475.890, 475.892, 475.904
or 475.906 or section 3 of this 2011 Act.
(B) Has been convicted under ORS
161.405 of an attempt to commit any of the crimes listed in subparagraph (A) of
this paragraph.
(C) Has been convicted in another
jurisdiction of a crime that is substantially equivalent, as defined by rule,
to any of the crimes listed in subparagraphs (A) and (B) of this paragraph.
(D) Has had a teaching, personnel
service or administrative license or registration revoked in another
jurisdiction for a reason that is substantially equivalent, as defined by rule,
to a reason described in ORS 342.175 and the revocation is not subject to
further appeal. A person whose privilege to apply for a license or registration
is denied under this subparagraph may apply for reinstatement of the privilege
as provided in ORS 342.175 (4).
(b) The Teacher Standards and
Practices Commission may refuse to issue a license or registration to any
person who has been convicted of a crime involving the illegal use, sale or
possession of controlled substances.
(4) In denying the issuance of a
license or registration under this section, the commission shall follow the
procedure set forth in ORS 342.176 and 342.177.
(5) The Department of Education shall
provide school districts and public charter schools a copy of the list
contained in subsection (3) of this section.
SECTION 12. ORS 419B.005, as amended
by section 4, chapter 60, Oregon Laws 2010, is amended to read:
419B.005. As used in ORS 419B.005 to
419B.050, unless the context requires otherwise:
(1)(a) “Abuse” means:
(A) Any assault, as defined in ORS
chapter 163, of a child and any physical injury to a child which has been
caused by other than accidental means, including any injury which appears to be
at variance with the explanation given of the injury.
(B) Any mental injury to a child,
which shall include only observable and substantial impairment of the child’s
mental or psychological ability to function caused by cruelty to the child,
with due regard to the culture of the child.
(C) Rape of a child, which includes
but is not limited to rape, sodomy, unlawful sexual penetration and incest, as
those acts are described in ORS chapter 163.
(D) Sexual abuse, as described in ORS
chapter 163.
(E) Sexual exploitation, including but
not limited to:
(i) Contributing to the sexual
delinquency of a minor, as defined in ORS chapter 163, and any other conduct
which allows, employs, authorizes, permits, induces or encourages a child to
engage in the performing for people to observe or the photographing, filming,
tape recording or other exhibition which, in whole or in part, depicts sexual
conduct or contact, as defined in ORS 167.002 or described in ORS 163.665 and
163.670, sexual abuse involving a child or rape of a child, but not including
any conduct which is part of any investigation conducted pursuant to ORS
419B.020 or which is designed to serve educational or other legitimate
purposes; and
(ii) Allowing, permitting, encouraging
or hiring a child to engage in prostitution or to patronize a prostitute,
as defined in ORS chapter 167.
(F) Negligent treatment or
maltreatment of a child, including but not limited to the failure to provide
adequate food, clothing, shelter or medical care that is likely to endanger the
health or welfare of the child.
(G) Threatened harm to a child, which
means subjecting a child to a substantial risk of harm to the child’s health or
welfare.
(H) Buying or selling a person under
18 years of age as described in ORS 163.537.
(I) Permitting a person under 18 years
of age to enter or remain in or upon premises where methamphetamines are being
manufactured.
(J) Unlawful exposure to a controlled
substance, as defined in ORS 475.005, that subjects a child to a substantial
risk of harm to the child’s health or safety.
(b) “Abuse” does not include
reasonable discipline unless the discipline results in one of the conditions
described in paragraph (a) of this subsection.
(2) “Child” means an unmarried person
who is under 18 years of age.
(3) “Public or private official”
means:
(a) Physician, osteopathic physician,
physician assistant, naturopathic physician, podiatric physician and surgeon,
including any intern or resident.
(b) Dentist.
(c) School employee.
(d) Licensed practical nurse,
registered nurse, nurse practitioner, nurse’s aide, home health aide or
employee of an in-home health service.
(e) Employee of the Department of
Human Services, Oregon Health Authority, State Commission on Children and
Families, Child Care Division of the Employment Department, the Oregon Youth
Authority, a county health department, a community mental health program, a
community developmental disabilities program, a county juvenile department, a
licensed child-caring agency or an alcohol and drug treatment program.
(f) Peace officer.
(g) Psychologist.
(h) Member of the clergy.
(i) Regulated social worker.
(j) Optometrist.
(k) Chiropractor.
(L) Certified provider of foster care,
or an employee thereof.
(m) Attorney.
(n) Licensed professional counselor.
(o) Licensed marriage and family
therapist.
(p) Firefighter or emergency medical
technician.
(q) A court appointed special
advocate, as defined in ORS 419A.004.
(r) A child care provider registered
or certified under ORS 657A.030 and 657A.250 to 657A.450.
(s) Member of the Legislative
Assembly.
(t) Physical, speech or occupational
therapist.
(u) Audiologist.
(v) Speech-language pathologist.
(w) Employee of the Teacher Standards
and Practices Commission directly involved in investigations or discipline by
the commission.
(x) Pharmacist.
(y) An operator of a preschool
recorded program under ORS 657A.255.
(z) An operator of a school-age
recorded program under ORS 657A.257.
(aa) Employee of a private agency or
organization facilitating the provision of respite services, as defined in ORS
418.205, for parents pursuant to a properly executed power of attorney under
ORS 109.056.
(4) “Law enforcement agency” means:
(a) Any city or municipal police
department.
(b) Any county sheriff’s office.
(c) The Oregon State Police.
(d) A county juvenile department.
SECTION 13. Section 3 of this 2011
Act and the amendments to ORS 12.117, 90.396, 105.555, 131.602, 133.724,
133.726, 167.007, 342.143 and 419B.005 by sections 1 and 4 to 12 of this 2011
Act apply to conduct occurring on or after the effective date of this 2011 Act.
Approved by
the Governor May 27, 2011
Filed in the
office of Secretary of State May 27, 2011
Effective date
January 1, 2012
__________