Chapter 146

 

      Chapter 146

 

LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 10 WLJ 2-10 (1973)

 

      146.035

 

      See also annotations under ORS 146.040 in permanent edition.

 

NOTES OF DECISIONS

 

      Provision that allows parent, spouse, child and other specified persons to examine and obtain copies of reports ordered by medical examiner does not imply, by negative inference, that those reports are exempt from disclosure for all other persons. Colby v. Gunson, 224 Or App 666, 199 P3d 350 (2008)

 

      146.065

 

      See annotations under ORS 146.420 in permanent edition.

 

      146.090

 

      See annotations under ORS 146.030 in permanent edition.

 

      146.095

 

      See annotations under ORS 146.560 in permanent edition.

 

      146.103

 

NOTES OF DECISIONS

 

      Medical examiner’s right to take charge of body included rolling body over and making observations for later use as basis for search warrant. State v. Blasingame, 127 Or App 382, 873 P2d 361 (1994), Sup Ct review denied

 

      146.107

 

      See also annotations under ORS 146.450 in permanent edition.

 

NOTES OF DECISIONS

 

      Warrantless entry of residence by medical examiner solely for purposes of examining body and investigating cause of death does not violate federal or state constitutional protection against unreasonable search. State v. Ferrara, 218 Or App 57, 178 P3d 250 (2008), Sup Ct review denied

 

      146.117

 

      See annotations under ORS 146.470 in permanent edition.

 

      146.125

 

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Division of State Lands authority to dispose of money and property of intestate decedent without heirs, (1974) Vol 37, p 255

 

      146.750

 

NOTES OF DECISIONS

 

      For purpose of applying protections of Confrontation Clause, requirement that physician report non-accidental injury does not mean that out-of-court statements of patient to physician for purpose of medical treatment are testimonial. State v. Bella, 231 Or App 420, 220 P3d 128 (2009), Sup Ct review denied

 

      For purpose of determining whether statements need statutorily required corroboration, requirement that physician report non-accidental injury does not mean that statements made by patient to physician for purpose of medical treatment are confessional. State v. Bella, 231 Or App 420, 220 P3d 128 (2009), Sup Ct review denied