Chapter 181

      181.010

See annotations under ORS 181A.010.

      181.066

See annotations under ORS 181A.140.

      181.085

See annotations under ORS 181A.155.

      181.175

See annotations under ORS 181A.020.

      181.400

See annotations under ORS 181A.125.

      181.530

See annotations under ORS 181A.185.

      181.575

See annotations under ORS 181A.250.

      181.585

See annotations under ORS 181.838.

      181.586

See annotations under ORS 181.839.

      181.587

NOTE: Repealed as of January 1, 2014

See annotations under ORS 163A.215

      181.595

See annotations under ORS 163A.010.

      181.596

See annotations under ORS 163A.015.

      181.597

See annotations under ORS 163A.020.

      181.599

See annotations under ORS 163A.040.

      181.610

See annotations under ORS 181A.355.

      181.653

See annotations under ORS 181A.530.

      181.662

See annotations under ORS 181A.640.

      181.805

See annotations under ORS 163A.005.

      181.806

(formerly 181.595)

See annotations under ORS 163A.010.

      181.807

(formerly 181.596)

See annotations under ORS 163A.015.

      181.808

(formerly 181.597)

See annotations under ORS 163A.020.

      181.812

(formerly 181.599)

See annotations under ORS 163A.040.

      181.820

See annotations under ORS 163A.120.

      181.835

See annotations under ORS 163A.215.

      181.838

(formerly 181.585)

NOTE: Repealed as of August 12, 2015

NOTES OF DECISIONS

      Person has federal due process right to notice and evidentiary hearing prior to determination regarding predatory sex offender status. Noble v. Board of Parole, 327 Or 485, 964 P2d 990 (1998)

      Retroactive application of predatory sex offender registration and notification statutes does not violate Oregon Constitution protection against ex post facto laws (section 21, Article I), double jeopardy (section 12, Article I) or cruel and unusual punishment (section 16, Article I). Meadows v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, 181 Or App 565, 47 P3d 506 (2002), Sup Ct review denied

      Procedure to determine whether person is predatory sex offender must provide for considering evidence of offender’s current behavior and characteristics in making determination whether offender exhibits characteristics showing tendency to victimize or injure others. V.L.Y. v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, 338 Or 44, 106 P3d 145 (2005)

      181.839

(formerly 181.586)

NOTE: Repealed as of August 12, 2015

NOTES OF DECISIONS

      Mere designation of person as predatory sex offender, without further action, does not constitute additional punishment for ex post facto purposes. Frey v. Board of Parole, 152 Or App 462, 950 P2d 418 (1998), Sup Ct review denied

      Retroactive application of predatory sex offender registration and notification statutes does not violate Oregon Constitution protection against ex post facto laws (section 21, Article I), double jeopardy (section 12, Article I) or cruel and unusual punishment (section 16, Article I). Meadows v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, 181 Or App 565, 47 P3d 506 (2002), Sup Ct review denied

      Giving notice of predatory sex offender to community does not impose sufficient affirmative disability to render statute punitive in nature, therefore constitutional protections against ex post facto laws, double jeopardy and cruel and unusual punishment do not apply. Meadows v. Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision, 181 Or App 565, 47 P3d 506 (2002), Sup Ct review denied

LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 35 WLR 83 (1999)

      181.871

See annotations under ORS 181A.845.