Chapter 225

      225.020

NOTES OF DECISIONS

      This statute and ORS 225.030 should be construed together. Bell v. City of Corvallis, 25 Or App 821, 551 P2d 125 (1976)

      The words “and for profit” should be taken as a broadening of a city’s authority to facilitate the furnishing of water to outside areas. Bell v. City of Corvallis, 25 Or App 821, 551 P2d 125 (1976)

      City’s purchase of water company whose facilities and service area were adjacent to but outside city limits was valid where authorized by city charter pursuant to this section. Kassel v. City of Salem, 34 Or App 739, 579 P2d 874 (1978)

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Municipal ownership and purchase of a franchised utility, (1973) Vol 36, p 521

LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 54 OLR 546 (1975)

      225.030

NOTES OF DECISIONS

      This statute and ORS 225.020 should be construed together. Bell v. City of Corvallis, 25 Or App 821, 551 P2d 125 (1976)

      225.250

NOTES OF DECISIONS

      The expenditure of public money to advocate voter approval of a bonding issue is not impliedly authorized as necessarily incident to the express powers granted by this section or ORS 225.270. Porter v. Tiffany, 11 Or App 542, 502 P2d 1385 (1972), Sup Ct review denied

      Language in this section relating to “alterations, improvements, additions or extensions” to electric plant or distributing systems furnished authorization for energy conservation plan of Eugene Water and Electric Board. Nicoll v. City of Eugene, 52 Or App 379, 628 P2d 1213 (1981), as modified by53 Or App 528, 632 P2d 502 (1981)

      225.450 to 225.490

NOTES OF DECISIONS

      If cities and PUDs otherwise had authority to enter Participants’ Agreement with WPPSS, enactment of Thermal Power Facilities Act did not supersede or restrict that authority, except for policy against financing another participant’s share. DeFazio v. WPPSS, 296 Or 550, 679 P2d 1316 (1984)