Chapter 236

 

      236.010

 

NOTES OF DECISIONS

 

      Where Senate fails to confirm reappointment of incumbent, resulting vacancy for new term does not prevent incumbent from continuing in office as holdover pending appointment and confirmation of successor. State ex rel Adams v. Powell, 171 Or App 81, 15 P3d 54 (2000)

 

      Although qualification to serve as district attorney requires active membership in Oregon State Bar, brief suspension from practice of law for disciplinary violation constituted only transient change in office-holder’s qualification status, which was insufficient to cause district attorney to “cease[ ] to possess” requisite qualification for office and, therefore, did not cause office of district attorney to become “vacant” within meaning of this section. State ex rel Rosenblum v. Nisley, 367 Or 78, 473 P3d 46 (2020)

 

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Qualifications required for newly elected county assessor, (1974) Vol 36, p 898; propriety of office holding of a land owning nonresident elected director of a rural fire protection district, (1975) Vol 37, p 873; effect of disbarment on person’s service as district attorney, (2001) Vol 49, p 272

 

      236.100

 

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Validity of requirement that vacancy in partisan elective county office be filled by member of same party as predecessor, (1975) Vol 37, p 505

 

      236.210

 

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Power of home rule county to provide method of filling vacancy in county office, (1974) Vol 37, p 280

 

      236.610 to 236.650

 

NOTES OF DECISIONS

 

      The specific terms of ORS 342.120 et seq., relating to teachers, controlled over the general terms of these sections, so these sections did not guarantee retention of permanent teacher status by a teacher who transferred from a school district to an Intermediate Education District. Davis v. Wasco IED, 286 Or 261, 593 P2d 1152 (1979)

 

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Retirement contributions by Department of Environmental Quality to Multnomah County Retirement System for Columbia-Willamette Air Pollution Authority, (1973) Vol 36, p 746; effect of transfer of Alcohol Safety Action Program and Comprehensive Options for Drug Abusers from state operation to Multnomah County, (1978) Vol 38, p 2079; entitlement of Corrections Division employe, transferred from state to county employment under Community Corrections Act program contract, to continued participation in PERS and to return to state employment at contract termination, (1978) Vol 39, p 357; status of employes performing duties under Comprehensive Employment and Training Act program following transfer to consortium of twenty-two Oregon counties, (1981) Vol 42, p 1

 

      236.610

 

NOTES OF DECISIONS

 

      An employe who has never had civil service status is not within the protection of this section. Dist. Court of Multnomah County v. Multnomah County, 21 Or App 161, 534 P2d 207 (1975)

 

      The term “public employe” in this section does not include public school teachers. Davis v. Wasco IED, 286 Or 261, 579 P2d 282 (1979)

 

      Statute does not create contract between public employers and public employees preventing state from amending, repealing or excepting out of statute. FOPPO v. State of Oregon, 144 Or App 535, 928 P2d 335 (1996)

 

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Definition of “facility,” (1978) Vol 38, p 2079

 

      236.620

 

NOTES OF DECISIONS

 

      “Transferring employee” does not include public school teachers. Davis v. Wasco IED, 286 Or 261, 593 P2d 1152 (1979)

 

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: “Seniority” protection of transferred employes, (1978) Vol 38, p 2079

 

      236.630

 

NOTES OF DECISIONS

 

      “Transferring employee” does not include public school teachers. Davis v. Wasco IED, 286 Or 261, 593 P2d 1152 (1979)

 

      236.640

 

NOTES OF DECISIONS

 

      Where schoolteacher’s appeal from education district’s termination of her employment had been remanded to Fair Dismissal Appeals Board, and she claimed right to reinstatement under this section if her termination were affirmed, there was no ripe, justiciable controversy. Davis v. The Dalles Sch. Dist. No 12, 37 Or App 109, 586 P2d 397 (1978)