Chapter 275

 

      275.027

 

NOTES OF DECISIONS

 

      ORS 12.250 and 275.027 are properly viewed not as limiting ability of adverse possessors to acquire title to county lands, but as removing impediment to county’s ability to defend its record title to real property. Coos County v. State of Oregon, 303 Or 173, 734 P2d 1348 (1987)

 

      275.080

 

NOTES OF DECISIONS

 

      Where a county entered into an option agreement to sell county property under authority contained in this section, and the evidence showed that the proposed purchasers were not eligible to purchase under the terms of this section, the option agreement was void. Baker v. Deschutes County, 10 Or App 236, 498 P2d 803 (1972)

 

      275.110 to 275.250

 

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Prior owner’s purchasing right in “exchange” of foreclosed land, (1974) Vol 36, p 1142; exchange of land purchased with money from County Road Fund, (1982) Vol 42, p 271

 

      275.180

 

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Prior owner’s purchasing right in “exchange” of foreclosed land, (1974) Vol 36, p 1142

 

      275.190 to 275.220

 

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Prior owner’s purchasing right in “exchange” of foreclosed land, (1974) Vol 36, p 1142

 

      275.275

 

NOTES OF DECISIONS

 

      Interest earned on principal received from mineral leases is component of “total proceeds” and therefore, defendant was entitled to 10 percent of principal and interest. State ex rel School Dist. 13 v. Columbia County, 66 Or App 237, 674 P2d 608 (1983), Sup Ct review denied

 

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: County deduction of administrative costs for management of oil and gas leases and foreclosed property sales, (1980) Vol 41, p 4

 

      275.298

 

NOTES OF DECISIONS

 

      This section is not unconstitutional on equal protection grounds. Bryant v. Seagraves, 270 Or 16, 526 P2d 1027 (1974)

 

      275.330

 

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: County grants of easements across county forest lands, (1981) Vol 42, p 140

 

      275.335

 

NOTES OF DECISIONS

 

      County land exchange decision affecting certain specified pieces of property can be quasi-judicial function subject to review under ORS 34.040. Hood River Valley Residents’ Committee, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of Hood River County, 193 Or App 485, 91 P3d 748 (2004)

 

      275.340

 

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Rock as included in phrase “other forest products”, (1981) Vol 42, p 140