Chapter 338
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Ability of charter school to contract operations to private, for-profit entity, (2000) Vol 49, p 254
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 36 WLR 265 (2000)
338.015
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 36 WLR 265 (2000)
338.035
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Ability of charter school to contract operations to private, for-profit entity, (2000) Vol 49, p 254
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 36 WLR 265 (2000)
338.045
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 36 WLR 265 (2000)
338.055
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Ability of charter school to contract operations to private, for-profit entity, (2000) Vol 49, p 254
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 36 WLR 265 (2000)
338.065
NOTES OF DECISIONS
As used in this section, “an expiring charter shall remain in effect until a new charter is negotiated” means that, for purposes of avoiding interruption in service, if parties are engaged in productive negotiations, charter school may legally continue in operation, even if existing charter technically expires before new charter is executed. This section does not bind parties to future relationship based only on approval of charter proposal and in absence of final agreement in charter negotiations before expiration of existing charter. Oregon Connections Academy v. SCIO School District 95C, 278 Or App 272, 374 P3d 962 (2016)
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 36 WLR 265 (2000)
338.075
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 36 WLR 265 (2000)
338.105
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 36 WLR 265 (2000)
338.115
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Ability of charter school to contract operations to private, for-profit entity, (2000) Vol 49, p 254
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 36 WLR 265 (2000)
338.125
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 36 WLR 265 (2000)
338.135
NOTES OF DECISIONS
Parents conducting day-to-day instruction of students are considered teaching staff for purposes of 50 percent licensure requirement. Coquille School District 8 v. Castillo, 212 Or App 596, 159 P3d 338 (2007)
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Ability of charter school to contract operations to private, for-profit entity, (2000) Vol 49, p 254
338.145
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 36 WLR 265 (2000)