Chapter 351
351.060
NOTE: Repealed as of July 27, 2015
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Disposal of board real property for nominal or other price substantially below fair market value, (1977) Vol 38, p 1626; Oregon Investment Council rather than State Board of Higher Education has primary authority to make investment decisions regarding higher education investment funds, (1989) Vol 46, p 143; board and investment council may cooperate in setting investment policy regarding higher education funds, (1989) Vol 46, p 143
351.065
See annotations under ORS 352.226.
351.070
NOTE: Repealed as of July 27, 2015
NOTES OF DECISIONS
Petitioner, who held one-year teaching contract with state college, was employee of board and therefore was not entitled to judicial review under ORS 183.484. Gruszczynski v. Board of Higher Education, 106 Or App 260, 806 P2d 1168 (1991)
This provision grants State Board of Higher Education authority to adopt rules and bylaws that govern any person on property under board’s jurisdiction. Oregon Firearms v. Board of Higher Education, 245 Or App 713, 264 P3d 160 (2011)
COMPLETED CITATIONS: Beistel v. Pub. Employe Relations Bd., 6 Or App 115, 486 P2d 1305 (1971)
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Legal relation between board and Oregon Student Public Interest Research Group, (1975) Vol 37, p 621; authority to contract for selling computer services to Willamette University, (1976) Vol 38, p 82; student government committees recommending fee assessments and allocations as subject to Public Meetings Law, (1984) Vol 44, p 69; committee containing voting non-student members as part of “recognized student government”, (1984) Vol 44, p 69; higher education student governments as state entities for purposes of receiving legal advice only from Department of Justice, (1996) Vol 48, p 40
LAW REVIEW CITATIONS: 51 OLR 7-69 (1971)
351.085
NOTE: Repealed as of July 27, 2015
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: State and federal affirmative action requirements for positions on staff of Chancellor of Higher Education, (1982) Vol 42, p 291
351.088
NOTES OF DECISIONS
Where public university held student expulsion hearing during which university sought to revoke petitioner’s privilege to attend university, hearing was type of action “substantially of the character” that would necessitate contested case procedures under Oregon’s Administrative Procedures Act and was therefore required to be consistent with APA. Liu v. Portland State University, 281 Or App 294, 383 P3d 294 (2016), Sup Ct review denied
351.160
See annotations under ORS 352.157.
351.310
NOTE: Repealed as of July 27, 2015
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Legal relation between board and Oregon Student Public Interest Research Group, (1975) Vol 37, p 621
351.340
NOTE: Repealed as of July 27, 2015
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Legal relation between board and Oregon Student Public Interest Research Group, (1975) Vol 37, p 621
351.345
NOTE: Repealed as of July 27, 2015
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Authority for creation of Community College and Education Center Building Fund, (1977) Vol 38, p 1276
351.460
NOTE: Repealed as of July 27, 2015
ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Creation and disposition of Community College and Education Center Sinking Fund, (1977) Vol 38, p 1276