††††† Chapter 802

 

††††† 802.010

 

 

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS

 

Under former similar statute

 

††††† Authority of Motor Vehicles Division to adopt motor vehicle inspection program, (1974) Vol 36, p 1107

 

††††† 802.090

 

††††† See annotations under ORS 247.017.

 

††††† 802.110

 

 

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS

 

Under former similar statute

 

††††† Concerning transfer of Motor Vehicles Division funds, (1976) Vol 38, p 348

 

††††† 802.177

 

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Disclosure to state agencies of personal information from motor vehicle records, (1998) Vol 49, p 127

 

††††† 802.179

 

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Government agency access, use and redisclosure of personal information from motor vehicle records, (1998) Vol 49, p 127

 

††††† 802.181

 

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: State agency use of personal information from motor vehicle records, (1998) Vol 49, p 127

 

††††† 802.200

 

NOTES OF DECISIONS

 

††††† Printout of driving record presented as evidence at trial is not testimonial. State v. Davis, 211 Or App 550, 156 P3d 93 (2007)

 

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS: Highway funds not available for recording commercial driving record information, (2000) Vol 49, p 230

 

††††† 802.220

 

NOTES OF DECISIONS

 

In general

 

††††† Provision prohibiting commercial use of information obtained from public record is unconstitutional restriction on commercial free speech. Zackheim v. Forbes, 134 Or App 548, 895 P2d 793 (1995), Sup Ct review denied

 

ATTY. GEN. OPINIONS

 

Under former similar statute (ORS 486.056)

 

††††† Authority of MVD to charge fee and issue non-certified records, (1978) Vol 39, p 61

 

††††† 802.240

 

NOTES OF DECISIONS

 

Under former similar statute

 

††††† Transfer of ownership occurs upon transfer of possession and control of vehicle, whether or not certificate of title has been transferred. Wisbey v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 264 Or 600, 507 P2d 17 (1973)

†††† Evidence that automobile was paid for by ex-wife, and that she had had continuous possession of automobile until it was taken from her by ex-husbandís employes, was sufficient to overcome presumption that ex-husband was entitled to possession of car because title was in his name. Brunk v. Horton, 280 Or 239, 570 P2d 382 (1977)